Gal

Page 2 of 2 | Previous page

6 comments on this post.
  1. Graham Chambers:

    The term “girl” for a young female may have come into use in the 14th century, but Shakespeare was still using it to mean a young person of either sex in the 16th century.

  2. Donna Holumzer:

    I have just been told by two black female co-workers that the term”gal” means female horse. So when older white men call them gal they are calling them a horse. It is a negative word for black women when white males call them that. All this is new to me.

  3. Devia:

    uh – black slavery = GAL
    men – got boy and son – to strip them of adulthood and dignity of family bonds – it removed their status as “productive adults”
    women had to have an equivalent and gal became the word of choice – and as far as I am led to understand had some relation or bearing to livestock …

    It is not only negative but derogatory and insulting and the horse reference is ringing bells for me – I found my version of it in historical slavery archives … so it IS out there if this “word detective” bothered to go LOOK around – My VERY british family never uses the word however my sold into slavery and got out side uses it LOTS so – YOU figure it out …

  4. Terry:

    Gal means woman. It can be prefaced with young or old, or any descriptive pronoun. There is no racial slur attached. I prefer it rather than call everyone Guy – which is a man’s name, specifically Guy Faulks, who was hanged by James I of England.

  5. Linda:

    A colleague referred to women generally as gals during a presentation. An African-american lady politely approached him afterward and advised him of the negative connotation of the word “gal” from the days of slavery. While I am sure he will not use the term in the future and had no idea that the term was ever pejorative the encounter left me puzzled. My family are all immigrants who arrived in the US after the civil war. Naturally, I have learned that there are some words that are currently considered racist or show a lack of sensitivity and do not use them. I also know that there are words that have had other popular meanings in the distant and near past that are unused now. Gal is one of them. To bring up a 150+ year-old meaning of a common word that has had so many other meanings since then and to be insulted by it is a troubling sensitivity. People cannot be held to that standard of “political correctness” and expect to have any communication at all. Any word, if used sarcastically, or disrespectfully can offend. We need to concentrate more on context and currency and let the past remain the past.

  6. R. Williams:

    I have been frustrated to no end by two coworkers who insist that the use of the word “gal” is pejorative and should never ever ever be used. I do not like referring to our young adult female students at the college “girls” as it seems diminutive, and condescending. I’ve spent half my life in the south, and “gal” is frequently used as a kindly female equivalent to “guy” (as girls are to boys), and frankly context is relevant. Just as there is nothing wrong with the word “boys”, calling an adult male “boy” is bound to end in offense… thus context is relevant. Being told that the world “gal” can only be judged by its period of use during black oppression is rather frustrating to me, as unlike other more provocative words, its status as good or bad seems highly variable.

Leave a comment